Appellant / Complainant
Irfan Ahmad Siddiqui
Respondent
Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd.
rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126001762020 by Irfan Ahmad Siddiqui against Rsons Infraland Developers Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Ex-Parte
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter.
Ex-Parte
The appeal was adjourned due to the non-appearance of the parties and is listed for further orders on January 3, 2023.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal noted the non-appearance of both parties for the last two hearings and directed them to appear on the next date, scheduling an ex-parte hearing for 02.12.2022.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of both counsels and scheduled the matter for further orders on 07.11.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the case due to the non-appearance of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
Further Order
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 04.08.2022 and directed that if the respondent fails to file a reply or appear, the case may proceed ex-parte.
Further Order
The Tribunal issued a fresh notice to the respondent to ensure they are heard on merits and directed the appellant to serve the memo of appeal via speed post and email.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in multiple consolidated appeals, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, and directed the Registry to register them as regular appeals.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application on the point of limitation and reserved judgment on that specific issue.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the service of notice on the respondent and scheduled the case for 04.01.2022 to dispose of the limitation application and any objections.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient for the respondent and granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
Ex-Parte
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the case for hearing on 09.11.2021.
For Order
The order directs the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated 26.02.2021 in Appeal No. (D) 164 of 2020.
For Order
The Tribunal granted the appellant a one-week extension to file an application for newspaper publication of notice because summons could not be served at the respondent's closed office; the case is listed for 26.02.2021.
Tribunal Order #0901126001762020-05-03-2022
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in multiple consolidated appeals, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, and directed the Registry to register them as regular appeals.
Tribunal Order #0901126001762020-09-11-2021
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient for the respondent and granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
Tribunal Order #0901126001762020-04-08-2022
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Shishir Srivastava
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal allowed the applications for condonation of delay in multiple consolidated appeals, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000 to be deposited in the Tribunal's fund, and directed the Registry to register them as regular appeals.
The Tribunal ruled that service of notice via newspaper publication is sufficient for the respondent and granted the appellant one week to file a better affidavit in support of their application for condonation of delay.
The Tribunal directed that the case proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their absence and scheduled the matter for an ex-parte hearing on 05.09.2022.
Need to research all rulings for rsons infraland developers pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.