Appellant / Complainant
Himanshu Kumar
Respondent
Supertech Limited
supertech limited
Unknown
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002282021 by Himanshu Kumar against Supertech Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company (M/s Supertech Limited) under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to seek instructions regarding the withdrawal of the appeal and filing a claim with the IRP due to the respondent's moratorium, adjourning the matter to 04.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of the defective appeal to 18.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the matter for hearing on April 11, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, and directed the applicant to re-file the memo of appeal in the correct folder.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide a copy of their limitation application to the respondent via email and scheduled the matter for January 17, 2022, to address the limitation application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on December 17, 2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and directed the applicant to serve notice, the memo of appeal, and the application for condonation of delay to the respondent via speed post and email, with the next hearing scheduled for 01.11.2021.
Defect Removal
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to remove registry defects and failed to appear in court.
Tribunal Order #0901126002282021-04-05-2022
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company (M/s Supertech Limited) under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company (M/s Supertech Limited) under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Awarded in favor of Unknown.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company (M/s Supertech Limited) under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Ruling Awarded To
Unknown
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Raghvendra Kumar Singh
- Gaurav Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Inderpreet Singh Chaddha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium has been declared against the respondent company (M/s Supertech Limited) under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for supertech limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.