up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126008312021

Appellant / Complainant

Indrajeet Kumar Brahmacharee, Sarita Kumari

VS

Respondent

Supertech Limited, Supertech Realtors Private Limited

Developer Firm

supertech limited

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

28 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126008312021 by Indrajeet Kumar Brahmacharee, Sarita Kumari against Supertech Limited, Supertech Realtors Private Limited before up_rera.

2
Stage 112/02/2024

For Order

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.

3
Stage 210/10/2023

For Order

No text available.

4
Stage 330/08/2023

For Order

No text available.

5
Stage 412/07/2023

For Order

No text available.

6
Stage 502/05/2023

Notice

The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the matter for orders on 12.07.2023.

7
Stage 621/03/2023

Notice

No text available.

8
Stage 710/02/2023

Notice

No text available.

9
Stage 806/01/2023

Notice

No text available.

10
Stage 906/12/2022

Notice

No text available.

11
Stage 1011/11/2022

Notice

The Tribunal noted the filing of objections by Supertech Limited and directed Respondent No. 2 to file a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing date.

12
Stage 1113/10/2022

Notice

No text available.

13
Stage 1208/09/2022

Notice

The Tribunal directed the issuance of fresh notice to the respondent via email and outlined the procedural steps for service of the appeal documents and subsequent filing of replies.

14
Stage 1310/08/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal issued a notice to M/s Supertech Realators Pvt. Ltd. via email and scheduled the matter for further orders on 08.09.2022.

15
Stage 1404/07/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal noted the appellant's clarification regarding the respondent party and directed all parties to appear at the next hearing scheduled for 10.08.2022.

16
Stage 1526/04/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the parties to exchange and submit lists of dates, events, and relied-upon judgments, and ordered respondent No. 2's counsel to rectify defects in their Vakalatnama.

17
Stage 1616/03/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a short adjournment to the respondent's counsel to review the case record and listed the matter for hearing on 26.04.2022.

18
Stage 1728/02/2022

Hearing

No text available.

19
Stage 1807/12/2021

Hearing

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

20
Stage 1917/11/2021

Hearing

No text available.

21
Stage 2024/09/2021

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the appeal and directed them to file their Vakalatnama within 10 days, adjourning the matter to 17.11.2021.

22
Stage 2107/09/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal directed the respondent to serve a copy of their reply to the appellants via email within one week and scheduled the next hearing for September 24, 2021.

23
Stage 2203/05/2021

Hearing

No text available.

24
Stage 2306/04/2021

Hearing

No text available.

25
Stage 2409/03/2021

Notice

The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the appeal and directed the parties to exchange replies via email and upload documents to the e-portal before the next hearing on 06.04.2021.

26
Stage 2508/02/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent via registered post and email and scheduled the matter for hearing on 09.03.2021.

27
Stage 26Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126008312021-07-12-2021

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Prashant
  • Ajai Krishna Yadav

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Harish Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126008312021-07-12-2021

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant or their counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for supertech limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →