Appellant / Complainant
Akhilesh Kumar Srivatava
Respondent
Supertech Limited
supertech limited
Unknown
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126002312021 by Akhilesh Kumar Srivatava against Supertech Limited before up_rera.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to seek instructions regarding the withdrawal of the appeal and filing a claim with the IRP due to a moratorium declared against the respondent. The matter is adjourned to 04.05.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing and ordered the defective appeal to be listed on 18.04.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the appellant 10 days to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the case for hearing on April 11, 2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, and directed the applicant to file the memo of appeal in the correct folder.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide a copy of the limitation application dated 01.03.2021 to the respondent via email and scheduled the matter for 17.01.2022 to address the limitation application.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 17.12.2021.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and directed the applicant to issue fresh notice to the respondent and serve the application for condonation of delay and memo of appeal via speed post and email.
Defect Removal
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to remove registry defects or appear in court for the scheduled hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126002312021-04-05-2022
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited. Awarded in favor of Unknown.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited.
Ruling Awarded To
Unknown
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Raghvendra Kumar Singh
- Gaurav Pandey
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Inderpreet Singh Chaddha
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)
The Tribunal has decided to keep the appeal in abeyance because a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, has been declared against the respondent company, M/s Supertech Limited.
Need to research all rulings for supertech limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.