Appellant / Complainant
Viany Kumar Gupta
Respondent
Paramount Probuild Pvt. Ltd.
paramount probuild pvt. ltd.
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126003582019 by Viany Kumar Gupta against Paramount Probuild Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's impugned order, ruling that the previous decision failed to judiciously address issues of delayed possession and developer obligations, and directed the Authority to pass a fresh order within three months.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal re-heard the appellant in person and reserved the judgment for further delivery.
Hearing
The court noted that the case was wrongly listed for hearing as judgment had already been reserved.
Hearing
The Tribunal reserved judgment on the appeal and directed that the case records be summoned from RERA.
Hearing
The parties submitted that all necessary documents have been filed, and the Tribunal reserved the matter for judgment.
Further Order
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a concise list of flat defects and ordered the respondent to respond within a week, noting that a site inspection may be ordered at the parties' joint cost if discrepancies arise.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 18.03.2021 following an adjournment application submitted by the respondent's counsel.
Tribunal Order #0901126003582019-01-12-2022
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's impugned order, ruling that the previous decision failed to judiciously address issues of delayed possession and developer obligations, and directed the Authority to pass a fresh order within three months.
Tribunal Order #0901126003582019-18-03-2021
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a concise list of flat defects and ordered the respondent to respond within a week, noting that a site inspection may be ordered at the parties' joint cost if discrepancies arise.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's impugned order, ruling that the previous decision failed to judiciously address issues of delayed possession and developer obligations, and directed the Authority to pass a fresh order within three months. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's impugned order, ruling that the previous decision failed to judiciously address issues of delayed possession and developer obligations, and directed the Authority to pass a fresh order within three months.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Vinay Kumar Gupta
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Shivam Yadav
- Shashank Kumar
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the RERA Authority's impugned order, ruling that the previous decision failed to judiciously address issues of delayed possession and developer obligations, and directed the Authority to pass a fresh order within three months.
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a concise list of flat defects and ordered the respondent to respond within a week, noting that a site inspection may be ordered at the parties' joint cost if discrepancies arise.
Need to research all rulings for paramount probuild pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.