up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126005762022

Appellant / Complainant

Jitendra Kumar Sahu

VS

Respondent

Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

32,70,621

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

12 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126005762022 by Jitendra Kumar Sahu against Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / Interest
2
Stage 129/09/2022

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to the developer's failure to provide possession with a valid occupancy certificate.

3
Stage 225/07/2022

Hearing

No text available.

4
Stage 305/07/2022

For Order

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 19.05.2022 within one week and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 25.07.2022.

5
Stage 419/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding their application for an Occupancy Certificate and requisite safety certificates within 10 days.

6
Stage 504/05/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with subsequent instructions for electronic service and uploading of replies.

7
Stage 613/04/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant's reply.

8
Stage 721/03/2022

Delay condonation

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the appellant to serve the respondent via speed post and email.

9
Stage 8Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126005762022-29-09-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to the developer's failure to provide possession with a valid occupancy certificate.

10
Stage 9Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126005762022-05-07-2022

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 19.05.2022 within one week and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 25.07.2022.

11
Stage 10Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126005762022-19-05-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding their application for an Occupancy Certificate and requisite safety certificates within 10 days.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to the developer's failure to provide possession with a valid occupancy certificate. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: State Bank of India's MCLR+1% per annum.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: State Bank of India's MCLR+1% per annumStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to the developer's failure to provide possession with a valid occupancy certificate.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

State Bank of India's MCLR+1% per annum

Interest Period

from the date of deposit till the refund of the amount

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Siddharth Nandwani

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suyash Gupta

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126005762022-29-09-2022

The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and directed the respondent to refund the appellant's deposited amount with interest at SBI's MCLR+1% per annum due to the developer's failure to provide possession with a valid occupancy certificate.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126005762022-05-07-2022

The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to ensure compliance with the previous order dated 19.05.2022 within one week and scheduled the defective appeal for hearing on 25.07.2022.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126005762022-19-05-2022

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal based on Supreme Court precedents and directed the respondent to produce evidence regarding their application for an Occupancy Certificate and requisite safety certificates within 10 days.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →