up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126040272023

Appellant / Complainant

Pankaj Gupta, Neha Gupta

VS

Respondent

Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

9,02,500

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

16 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126040272023 by Pankaj Gupta, Neha Gupta against Panchsheel Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 117/01/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and ruled that allottees who withdraw from a delayed project are entitled to seek compensation (including rent) before the Adjudicating Officer, even if they have already received a refund and interest from the Regulatory Authority.

3
Stage 215/10/2024

Hearing

The court heard arguments from both parties regarding Appeal-586/2023 and has reserved the judgment for further consideration.

4
Stage 304/09/2024

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the case for orders or hearing to 15.10.2024.

5
Stage 402/08/2024

Hearing

No text available.

6
Stage 519/07/2024

Hearing

The matter is adjourned to 02.08.2024 for orders following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.

7
Stage 609/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted a request from both parties to adjourn the matter, scheduling the appeal for orders/hearing on 19.07.2024.

8
Stage 710/05/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel on health grounds and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.07.2024.

9
Stage 809/04/2024

Admission

The appeal is adjourned to 10.05.2024 because the counsel for the appellant is unable to attend due to an eye infection.

10
Stage 906/03/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week's time to file a reply to the respondent's objections and scheduled the next hearing for April 9, 2024.

11
Stage 1029/01/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and a vakalatnama, with a directive for the respondent to provide soft copies of said objections to the appellant's counsel.

12
Stage 1130/10/2023

Admission

No text available.

13
Stage 1218/09/2023

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined specific procedural requirements for service of notice via speed-post and email by the appellant, scheduling the next hearing for 30.10.2023.

14
Stage 1311/09/2023

Admission

The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings due to a call for lawyers to abstain from judicial work by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the matter for 18.09.2023.

15
Stage 14Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126040272023-17-01-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and ruled that allottees who withdraw from a delayed project are entitled to seek compensation (including rent) before the Adjudicating Officer, even if they have already received a refund and interest from the Regulatory Authority.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and ruled that allottees who withdraw from a delayed project are entitled to seek compensation (including rent) before the Adjudicating Officer, even if they have already received a refund and interest from the Regulatory Authority. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and ruled that allottees who withdraw from a delayed project are entitled to seek compensation (including rent) before the Adjudicating Officer, even if they have already received a refund and interest from the Regulatory Authority.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

w.e.f. September, 2016 to April, 2018

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Azhar Ikram
  • Manish Singh

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Amit Yadav

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126040272023-17-01-2025

The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Officer's order and ruled that allottees who withdraw from a delayed project are entitled to seek compensation (including rent) before the Adjudicating Officer, even if they have already received a refund and interest from the Regulatory Authority.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for panchsheel buildtech pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →