up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126016052025

Appellant / Complainant

Sushma Choudhary

VS

Respondent

Wtc Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.

Disputed Amount

22,50,524

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

12 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016052025 by Sushma Choudhary against Wtc Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 119/01/2026

Delay condonation

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act does not apply to the sale of 'non-lockable' or 'virtual space' in a commercial project, as such investments do not constitute the purchase of an identifiable, demarcated physical apartment.

3
Stage 210/12/2025

Admission

The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 19.01.2026 and issued a warning that the matter will proceed ex-parte if the respondent fails to file objections.

4
Stage 312/11/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent ten days to file objections and directed that a rejoinder be filed within one week thereafter, listing the matter for hearing on 10.12.2025.

5
Stage 416/10/2025

Admission

The Tribunal accepted proof of publication of notice in the 'Daily Business Standard' and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with the case scheduled for orders on 12.11.2025.

6
Stage 523/09/2025

Admission

The Tribunal has granted a request to list the appeal on 16.10.2025.

7
Stage 620/08/2025

Admission

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's application for substituted service via newspaper publication due to failed service by post and directed the appellant to complete publication and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing on 23.09.2025.

8
Stage 730/07/2025

Admission

The Tribunal granted the appellant time to file an application for substituted service of notice on the respondent and adjourned the matter to 20.08.2025.

9
Stage 811/07/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted that the notice sent to the respondent was returned marked 'left', and the appellant's counsel requested time to file an application for substituted service. The matter is listed for orders on 30.07.2025.

10
Stage 920/05/2025

Admission

The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural steps for service of notice and the exchange of objections and replies before the next hearing on 11.07.2025.

11
Stage 10Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126016052025-19-01-2026

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act does not apply to the sale of 'non-lockable' or 'virtual space' in a commercial project, as such investments do not constitute the purchase of an identifiable, demarcated physical apartment.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act does not apply to the sale of 'non-lockable' or 'virtual space' in a commercial project, as such investments do not constitute the purchase of an identifiable, demarcated physical apartment. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act does not apply to the sale of 'non-lockable' or 'virtual space' in a commercial project, as such investments do not constitute the purchase of an identifiable, demarcated physical apartment.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Shukla

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126016052025-19-01-2026

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the RERA Act does not apply to the sale of 'non-lockable' or 'virtual space' in a commercial project, as such investments do not constitute the purchase of an identifiable, demarcated physical apartment.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →