up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126072262022

Appellant / Complainant

Baswaraj Tandur, Hifjur Reheman, Shagufta Nazneen

VS

Respondent

WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd.

Developer Firm

wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.

Disposal Award

Respondent

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of Investment

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

15 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126072262022 by Baswaraj Tandur, Hifjur Reheman, Shagufta Nazneen against WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of Investment
2
Stage 107/05/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants' complaints for a refund were premature because the promised date of possession (31.12.2024) had not yet passed.

3
Stage 226/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal converted a defective appeal into a regular appeal after the appellant filed the required certified copy and reserved judgment following arguments regarding the improper clubbing of complaints and discrepancies in possession timelines.

4
Stage 323/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-appearance and failure to comply with previous timelines, scheduling the matter for an ex parte hearing.

5
Stage 419/10/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

6
Stage 513/09/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

7
Stage 625/07/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

8
Stage 712/05/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

9
Stage 831/03/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent two days to file objections and scheduled the defective appeal for May 12, 2023, to consider the application for condonation of delay.

10
Stage 920/02/2023

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant to file a reply.

11
Stage 1010/01/2023

Defect Removal

The Tribunal granted the appellant one week to file a certified copy of the impugned order and directed the Registry to issue notice to the respondent for the hearing scheduled on 20.02.2023.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126072262022-07-05-2024

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants' complaints for a refund were premature because the promised date of possession (31.12.2024) had not yet passed.

13
Stage 12Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126072262022-26-02-2024

The Tribunal converted a defective appeal into a regular appeal after the appellant filed the required certified copy and reserved judgment following arguments regarding the improper clubbing of complaints and discrepancies in possession timelines.

14
Stage 13Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126072262022-23-01-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-appearance and failure to comply with previous timelines, scheduling the matter for an ex parte hearing.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants' complaints for a refund were premature because the promised date of possession (31.12.2024) had not yet passed. Awarded in favor of Respondent.

Disposal Winner: RespondentStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants' complaints for a refund were premature because the promised date of possession (31.12.2024) had not yet passed.

Ruling Awarded To

Respondent

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Arpan Prakash Srivastava

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Anup Gupta
  • Aditya Vikram Shahi
  • Arvind Kumar Pandey

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126072262022-07-05-2024

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants' complaints for a refund were premature because the promised date of possession (31.12.2024) had not yet passed.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126072262022-26-02-2024

The Tribunal converted a defective appeal into a regular appeal after the appellant filed the required certified copy and reserved judgment following arguments regarding the improper clubbing of complaints and discrepancies in possession timelines.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126072262022-23-01-2024

The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the condonation of delay application and grounds of appeal due to non-appearance and failure to comply with previous timelines, scheduling the matter for an ex parte hearing.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →