Appellant / Complainant
Anchal Garg
Respondent
WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd.
wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.
₹24,56,603
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126059822022 by Anchal Garg against WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd. before up_rera.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'virtual/non-lockable' space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not involve the allotment of a separate and self-contained physical unit.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent/promoter despite notice and adjourned the matter to 21.03.2025, clarifying that no further opportunities for appearance will be granted.
Re-Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent additional time to appear in the matter after they failed to respond to an email notice, noting that the appeal will proceed ex-parte if they fail to appear by the next date.
For Order
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 10.02.2025 and directed the Registry to issue notices to the parties regarding the fixed date.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to present arguments due to non-appearance and reserved judgment following the hearing of the appellant.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent's counsel to prepare their brief and adjourned the matter to 05.08.2024 for hearing.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted the absence of both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 25.07.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the respondent has already been proceeded ex-parte and scheduled the defective appeal for consideration of a condonation of delay application on 27.05.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the matter has proceeded ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled a hearing for the defective appeal on 25.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted that the matter has already proceeded ex-parte against the respondent and scheduled the appeal for an ex-parte hearing on 12.04.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant's pursuit of a re-examination application before the Regulatory Authority constituted a bona fide reason for the delay, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite previous extensions and a stop order. The matter is listed for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 22.02.2024.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal adjourned today's proceedings due to a three-day strike called by the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, scheduling the matter for hearing on 04.09.2023.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with the matter listed for hearing on 14.07.2023.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant three days to refile an application for condonation of delay as a formal Interlocutory Application (IA) and directed the service of notice to the respondent by 06.12.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an application for condonation of delay within one week due to the absence of such an application in the current proceedings.
Tribunal Order #0901126059822022-05-08-2024
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to present arguments due to non-appearance and reserved judgment following the hearing of the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126059822022-21-03-2025
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'virtual/non-lockable' space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not involve the allotment of a separate and self-contained physical unit.
Tribunal Order #0901126059822022-22-02-2024
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant's pursuit of a re-examination application before the Regulatory Authority constituted a bona fide reason for the delay, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126059822022-16-01-2024
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite previous extensions and a stop order. The matter is listed for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 22.02.2024.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'virtual/non-lockable' space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not involve the allotment of a separate and self-contained physical unit. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'virtual/non-lockable' space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not involve the allotment of a separate and self-contained physical unit.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Rachit Sondhi
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Anup Gupta
- Aditya Vikram Shahi
- Arvind Kumar Pandey
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to present arguments due to non-appearance and reserved judgment following the hearing of the appellant.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the sale of 'virtual/non-lockable' space does not fall under the scope of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016, as it does not involve the allotment of a separate and self-contained physical unit.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the appellant's pursuit of a re-examination application before the Regulatory Authority constituted a bona fide reason for the delay, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal decided to proceed ex-parte against the respondent due to their failure to file objections despite previous extensions and a stop order. The matter is listed for consideration of the application for condonation of delay on 22.02.2024.
Need to research all rulings for wtc noida development company pvt. ltd.?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.