up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126022892023

Appellant / Complainant

Ratan Buildtech Private Limited

VS

Respondent

Rashmita Nayak

Developer Firm

ratan buildtech private limited

Disposal Award

Partial

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

26 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126022892023 by Ratan Buildtech Private Limited against Rashmita Nayak before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestJurisdiction & Maintainability
2
Stage 114/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% for the period from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022, excluding a six-month COVID-19 force majeure period.

3
Stage 209/05/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 14.05.2025.

4
Stage 317/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 09.05.2025.

5
Stage 420/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 17.04.2025.

6
Stage 520/02/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 20.03.2025.

7
Stage 631/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 20.02.2025.

8
Stage 706/01/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 31.01.2025.

9
Stage 814/11/2024

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five appeals, ruling that since the impugned order prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issue.

10
Stage 918/09/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal heard arguments regarding an application for condonation of delay and reserved its judgment on the matter.

11
Stage 1014/08/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for orders or hearing on 18.09.2024.

12
Stage 1116/07/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has listed the appeal for orders/hearing on 14.08.2024, referring to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 260/2023.

13
Stage 1216/05/2024

Delay condonation

No text available.

14
Stage 1310/05/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 16.05.2024, noting that similar cases are listed for the same date.

15
Stage 1424/04/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted that pleadings have been exchanged and scheduled the appeal for hearing on 10.05.2024.

16
Stage 1529/03/2024

Delay condonation

This is a procedural order referring the matter to a previous order passed in Appeal No. D382/2023.

17
Stage 1615/03/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted an extension to the appellant's counsel to rectify potential deficiencies in compliance with Section 43(5) deposit requirements and scheduled the matter for hearing on March 29, 2024.

18
Stage 1713/02/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal has scheduled the hearing for the application for condonation of delay and the defective appeal for March 15, 2024, following a joint request from both counsels.

19
Stage 1805/01/2024

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension to the respondent for filing objections to the appeal, noting the delay and emphasizing the statutory mandate to dispose of appeals within 60 days.

20
Stage 1928/09/2023

Delay condonation

No text available.

21
Stage 2021/08/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections regarding the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the appellant to reply.

22
Stage 2103/07/2023

Delay condonation

The Tribunal noted the appellant's deposit of Rs. 6,60,335/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 21.08.2023.

23
Stage 22Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126022892023-14-05-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% for the period from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022, excluding a six-month COVID-19 force majeure period.

24
Stage 23Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126022892023-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five appeals, ruling that since the impugned order prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issue.

25
Stage 24Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126022892023-03-07-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's deposit of Rs. 6,60,335/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 21.08.2023.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% for the period from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022, excluding a six-month COVID-19 force majeure period. Awarded in favor of Partial. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: PartialInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% for the period from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022, excluding a six-month COVID-19 force majeure period.

Ruling Awarded To

Partial

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022 (excluding six months force majeure period for Covid-19)

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 3Section 79

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Mahima Pahwa

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Prashant Chandra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126022892023-14-05-2025

The Tribunal quashed the Adjudicating Officer's order due to lack of jurisdiction but settled the dispute by awarding the respondent delay interest at MCLR+1% for the period from 01.01.2020 to 28.09.2022, excluding a six-month COVID-19 force majeure period.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126022892023-14-11-2024

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing five appeals, ruling that since the impugned order prima facie appeared to be passed without jurisdiction, the delay should be excused to allow for a merit-based examination of the jurisdictional issue.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126022892023-03-07-2023

The Tribunal noted the appellant's deposit of Rs. 6,60,335/- in compliance with Section 43(5) and issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay, scheduled for hearing on 21.08.2023.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for ratan buildtech private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →