Appellant / Complainant
Jeevan Lata Verma
Respondent
Ram Raghu Buildwell
ram raghu buildwell
₹31,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032292022 by Jeevan Lata Verma against Ram Raghu Buildwell before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the respondent promoter must refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) with interest, finding that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using Section 39 to substantively alter a concluded decree.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both the appellant and respondent regarding Appeal-396/2022, but the judgment has been reserved for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the part-heard matter to 20.04.2026 and directed the parties to submit dates and events in the interim.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to list the appeal on 19.03.2026 for hearing before a regular Bench, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Part Heard
The appeal is adjourned to 23.02.2026 due to a technical glitch causing server inoperability.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.02.2026 due to the appellant's counsel being unable to appear because of accidental injuries.
Notice
The Tribunal noted the absence of the respondent and, upon submission by the appellant's counsel that the matter is part-heard, scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 06.01.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the part-heard appeal before the appropriate bench for further hearing on 27.11.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted that the matter is already part-heard by Bench No. 2 and ordered the appeal to be listed before that bench on 05.11.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a prayer to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 08.10.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 08.09.2025 before Bench No. 2.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders on 18.08.2025 before Court No. 2.
Part Heard
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and scheduled to be listed before the appropriate Bench on 11.08.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on July 22, 2025, and explicitly noted that no further adjournments will be granted to either party.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time for arguments and scheduled the next hearing for May 29, 2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and, upon their mutual request, adjourned the appeal to be listed on 19.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and adjourned the appeal to 12.05.2025 for final arguments.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment because the appellant's counsel was unable to appear due to illness, rescheduling the matter for May 6, 2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to argue the matter on the next hearing date of 15.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be allowed.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request filed by the appellant's counsel due to being out of station and rescheduled the hearing for March 6, 2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 24.02.2025 for the continuation of arguments.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 11.02.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment because the appellant's counsel was unavailable due to a family emergency, rescheduling the hearing for 21.01.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels for a date for final hearing and listed the appeal for orders/hearing on 13.12.2024.
Part Heard
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 03.12.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the parties additional time to complete their arguments and scheduled the matter for further hearing on 25.10.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and adjourned the matter to September 26, 2024, for the continuation of arguments.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on August 2, 2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted adjournment requests from both the appellant and respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 03.07.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on May 3, 2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 03.04.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal noted the filing of a supplementary affidavit by the appellant containing allotment and account details and directed the respondent to file objections within 10 days, listing the matter for hearing on 01.03.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit within 10 days providing proof of deposit/receipts and scheduled the matter for further orders on 24.01.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted adjournment requests from both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 14.08.2023.
Final Hearing
The matter was adjourned due to lack of time, with the case rescheduled to be heard on 31.05.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing to 26.04.2023 due to the absence of both counsels for the respondent and issued a strict warning that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week's time to prepare their brief and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 17.03.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a bereavement in the family and rescheduled the hearing for 07.02.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel in the matter of Jeevan Lata Verma vs. Ramraghu Buildwell.
Part Heard
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to serve a copy of the replication/rejoinder dated 08.11.2022 to the respondent and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.12.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for further arguments on 09.11.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the matter for further arguments on 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date for potential settlement negotiations.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections and a Vakalatnama, and directed both parties to exchange soft copies of their respective objections and replies via email before uploading them to the e-portal.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to complete service of process via speed post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126032292022-12-05-2026
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the respondent promoter must refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) with interest, finding that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using Section 39 to substantively alter a concluded decree.
Tribunal Order #0901126032292022-26-04-2023
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the respondent promoter must refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) with interest, finding that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using Section 39 to substantively alter a concluded decree. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1 percent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the respondent promoter must refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) with interest, finding that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using Section 39 to substantively alter a concluded decree.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1 percent
Interest Period
till the date of payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Tushar Bahadur
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johri
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (2)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order and ruled that the respondent promoter must refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) with interest, finding that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by using Section 39 to substantively alter a concluded decree.
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
Need to research all rulings for ram raghu buildwell?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.