Appellant / Complainant
Mahavir Singh Verma
Respondent
Ram Raghu Buildwell
ram raghu buildwell
₹31,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032302022 by Mahavir Singh Verma against Ram Raghu Buildwell before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 by attempting to review merits instead of merely rectifying clerical errors, and ordered the respondent to refund the full deposited amounts with interest.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has heard the arguments from both the appellant and respondent and has reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the part-heard matter to 20.04.2026 and directed the parties to submit dates and events in the interim.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to list the appeal for hearing before a regular Bench on 19.03.2026, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Part Heard
The appeal is adjourned to 23.02.2026 because the NIC reported that the server was inoperational due to a technical glitch.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment because the appellant's counsel was unable to appear due to accidental injuries, rescheduling the matter for February 2, 2026.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted that the matter is part-heard and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 06.01.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to list the appeal before an appropriate bench for further hearing on 27.11.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted that the matter is part-heard by Bench No. 2 and ordered the appeal to be listed before that bench on 05.11.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a prayer to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 08.10.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for further hearing before Bench No. 2 on 08.09.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders on 18.08.2025 before Court No. 2.
Part Heard
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and scheduled for listing before the appropriate Bench on 11.08.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 22.07.2025 and explicitly stated that no further adjournments will be granted to either party.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time for arguments and scheduled the next hearing for May 29, 2025, noting that no further extensions would be provided.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard both counsels and, upon their mutual request, adjourned the appeal to be listed on 19.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and adjourned the matter to 12.05.2025 for final arguments.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment because the appellant's counsel was unable to appear due to illness, rescheduling the matter for May 6, 2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to argue the matter and scheduled the next hearing for 15.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal scheduled Appeal-397/2022, along with Appeal Nos. 398 and 396 of 2022, for a final hearing on 07.04.2025 and noted that no further adjournments will be granted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for March 6, 2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 24.02.2025 for the continuation of arguments.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 11.02.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to a family emergency and adjourned the appeal to 21.01.2025 for orders/hearing.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels for an adjournment and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 13.12.2024.
Part Heard
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the tribunal has adjourned the appeal and scheduled it for orders/hearing on December 3, 2024.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted time to the counsel for both parties to complete their arguments and scheduled the matter for a hearing on 25.10.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the continuation of arguments for September 26, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on August 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted adjournment requests from both the appellant and respondent counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on 03.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on May 3, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a personal bereavement and scheduled the matter for hearing on 01.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit providing proof of deposit within 10 days and scheduled the matter for further orders on 24.01.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal engagements and rescheduled the hearing for 27.09.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the counsels of both parties and rescheduled the hearing for 19.09.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by both parties and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 16.08.2023.
Final Hearing
The matter was adjourned due to lack of time, with the case rescheduled for hearing on 31.05.2023.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the case records.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing to 26.04.2023 due to the absence of both counsels for the respondent, while issuing a strict warning that no further adjournments will be granted and the matter will proceed based on available records if parties fail to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to prepare their brief and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 17.03.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a bereavement in the family and rescheduled the hearing for 07.02.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the case to 04.01.2023 for further orders due to the absence of the respondent's counsel.
Part Heard
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to serve a copy of the replication/rejoinder dated 08.11.2022 to the respondent and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.12.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal due to the absence of the appellant and scheduled the matter for further arguments on 09.11.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date to attempt settlement negotiations.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections and a Vakalatnama, establishing a timeline for the exchange of electronic copies and subsequent replies before the next hearing on 17.08.2022.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and directed the applicant to follow specific service procedures for the memo of appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126032302022-12-05-2026
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 by attempting to review merits instead of merely rectifying clerical errors, and ordered the respondent to refund the full deposited amounts with interest.
Tribunal Order #0901126032302022-17-08-2022
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date to attempt settlement negotiations.
Tribunal Order #0901126032302022-26-04-2023
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the case records.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 by attempting to review merits instead of merely rectifying clerical errors, and ordered the respondent to refund the full deposited amounts with interest. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1 percent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 by attempting to review merits instead of merely rectifying clerical errors, and ordered the respondent to refund the full deposited amounts with interest.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1 percent
Interest Period
till the date of payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Tushar Bahadur
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johri
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 39 by attempting to review merits instead of merely rectifying clerical errors, and ordered the respondent to refund the full deposited amounts with interest.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date to attempt settlement negotiations.
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the case records.
Need to research all rulings for ram raghu buildwell?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.