Appellant / Complainant
Ravi Verma
Respondent
Ram Raghu Buildwell
ram raghu buildwell
₹31,00,000
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126032312022 by Ravi Verma against Ram Raghu Buildwell before up_rera.
for delivery of Judgment/Order
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that Section 39 of the Act does not permit the rectification of orders to include a substantive review of merits. The Tribunal ordered the respondent promoter to refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) along with interest at MCLR + 1%.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has heard the arguments from both the appellant and the respondent and has reserved the judgment for a later date.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the part-heard matter to 20.04.2026 and directed the parties to submit dates and events in the interim.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to adjourn the matter and listed the appeal for hearing before a regular Bench on 19.03.2026.
Part Heard
The appeal is adjourned to 23.02.2026 because the NIC reported that the server was inoperational due to a technical glitch.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 02.02.2026 due to the appellant's counsel being unable to appear because of accidental injuries.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a hearing on January 6, 2025, noting that the matter is part-heard.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal before an appropriate bench for further hearing on 27.11.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal to be listed before Bench No. 2 on 05.11.2025, following information that the matter is already part-heard by that bench.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 08.10.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for further hearing before Bench No. 2 on 08.09.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the case for orders on 18.08.2025 before Court No. 2.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 11.08.2025 following a joint request from the counsel for both parties.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on July 22, 2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted the respondent's counsel additional time for arguments and scheduled the appeal for its next hearing on 29.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and, upon their mutual request, adjourned the appeal to be listed on 19.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal heard arguments from both counsels and adjourned the appeal to 12.05.2025 for final arguments.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment due to the illness of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the matter for a subsequent hearing on 06.05.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a final opportunity to the respondent to argue the matter and scheduled the next hearing for 15.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the present appeal, along with Appeal Nos. 397 and 396 of 2022, for final hearing on 07.04.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be granted.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment request filed by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and rescheduled the hearing for 06.03.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal adjourned the matter and scheduled the case for the continuation of arguments on 24.02.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal has scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on February 11, 2025, noting the absence of the appellant's counsel.
Part Heard
The Tribunal noted the absence of the appellant's counsel due to a family emergency and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 21.01.2025.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted a request from both counsels for a date for final hearing and scheduled the appeal for orders/hearing on 13.12.2024.
Part Heard
Upon the joint request of the counsel for both parties, the appeal has been adjourned and listed for orders/hearing on 03.12.2024.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted the counsel for both parties additional time to argue the matter and scheduled the case for a hearing on 25.10.2024.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has adjourned the matter, scheduling the continuation of arguments for 26.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and scheduled the appeal for a hearing on August 2, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted adjournment requests from both counsels for the respondent due to personal unavailability and health reasons, and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 03.07.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has ordered the appeal to be listed for a hearing on May 3, 2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal has noted that no time remains for the current session and has ordered the appeal to be listed for hearing on 03.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the respondent's counsel to list this appeal for hearing on 01.03.2024 to align it with connected similar matters.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted a listing error and directed the appeal to be listed for orders on 13.02.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to rectify the repeated uploading of documents and noted the appellant's filing of a supplementary affidavit containing key evidence, including an agreement and statement of accounts. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 01.03.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file an affidavit providing proof of deposit/receipt with the respondent within 10 days and scheduled the matter for orders on 24.01.2024.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal granted adjournment requests from both parties and rescheduled the hearing for August 14, 2023.
Final Hearing
This text represents the header and bench composition of an appeal filed by Ravi Verma against Ramraghubuildwell before the U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, but it does not contain the substantive ruling or order itself.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
Final Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the hearing to 26.04.2023 due to the absence of both counsels for the respondent, while warning that no further adjournments will be granted and the matter will proceed based on available records if parties fail to appear.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to prepare their brief and scheduled the appeal for final hearing on 17.03.2023, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to a bereavement in the family and rescheduled the hearing for 07.02.2022.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the case for further orders on 04.01.2023.
Part Heard
The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to serve a copy of the replication/rejoinder dated 08.11.2022 to the respondent and scheduled the matter for further orders on 02.12.2022.
Part Heard
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 09.11.2022 for further arguments due to the absence of the appellant.
Part Heard
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply before the next hearing on 10.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date for potential settlement negotiations.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent one week to file objections and a Vakalatnama, directing a subsequent timeline for the appellant's reply and the uploading of documents to the e-portal.
Hearing on Appeal
The Tribunal issued a notice to the respondent regarding the application for condonation of delay and provided specific procedural instructions for the service of notice and filing of objections.
Tribunal Order #0901126032312022-12-05-2026
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that Section 39 of the Act does not permit the rectification of orders to include a substantive review of merits. The Tribunal ordered the respondent promoter to refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) along with interest at MCLR + 1%.
Tribunal Order #0901126032312022-24-01-2024
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to rectify the repeated uploading of documents and noted the appellant's filing of a supplementary affidavit containing key evidence, including an agreement and statement of accounts. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 01.03.2024.
Tribunal Order #0901126032312022-26-04-2023
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
Tribunal Order #0901126032312022-17-08-2022
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date for potential settlement negotiations.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that Section 39 of the Act does not permit the rectification of orders to include a substantive review of merits. The Tribunal ordered the respondent promoter to refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) along with interest at MCLR + 1%. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1 percent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that Section 39 of the Act does not permit the rectification of orders to include a substantive review of merits. The Tribunal ordered the respondent promoter to refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) along with interest at MCLR + 1%.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Awarded Interest Rate
MCLR + 1 percent
Interest Period
from the date of each deposit till the date of actual payment
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Tushar Bahadur
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Gautam Johri
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)
The Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order that had reduced the refund amount, ruling that Section 39 of the Act does not permit the rectification of orders to include a substantive review of merits. The Tribunal ordered the respondent promoter to refund the full deposited amounts (Rs. 31,00,000, Rs. 55,00,000, and Rs. 1,15,00,000 respectively) along with interest at MCLR + 1%.
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to rectify the repeated uploading of documents and noted the appellant's filing of a supplementary affidavit containing key evidence, including an agreement and statement of accounts. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 01.03.2024.
The Tribunal has granted the respondent one week to justify the legality of multiple rectifications made to a previous order without providing notice to the appellant, and directed the Registry to summon the original case records.
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply to the grounds of appeal and directed both parties to appear on the next date for potential settlement negotiations.
Need to research all rulings for ram raghu buildwell?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.