up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126016722021

Appellant / Complainant

Jagdamba Prasad Srivastava, Manish Srivastava Ors, Suchi Srivastava

VS

Respondent

Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Sahara Prime City Limited

Developer Firm

sahara prime city limited

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferNon-Compliance & Execution

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

13 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126016722021 by Jagdamba Prasad Srivastava, Manish Srivastava Ors, Suchi Srivastava against Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Sahara Prime City Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionRefund of InvestmentDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title TransferNon-Compliance & Execution
2
Stage 109/03/2022

Final Hearing

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 19.01.2021 and remanded the case back for fresh disposal, ruling that the executing authority cannot go behind the original decree regarding the validity of possession offers.

3
Stage 206/01/2022

Hearing

The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his absence from the station and directed the parties to exchange pleadings.

4
Stage 314/12/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a one-week extension to the respondent's counsel to file an objection/reply and directed both parties to upload their pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing on 06.01.2022.

5
Stage 425/11/2021

Hearing

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections and directed both parties to upload their pleadings on the e-portal before the next hearing scheduled for 14.12.2021.

6
Stage 527/10/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication or rejoinder affidavit if desired and scheduled the case for further orders on 25.11.2021.

7
Stage 605/10/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal granted the respondents two weeks to file objections to the grounds of appeal and adjourned the matter to 27.10.2021 due to the appellant's counsel being on leave.

8
Stage 710/09/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal directed the appellant to serve the appeal documents to the respondent via email and set a timeline for filing objections and replies before the next hearing on 05.10.2021.

9
Stage 828/04/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

10
Stage 905/04/2021

Hearing on Appeal

No text available.

11
Stage 1008/03/2021

Hearing on Appeal

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondents and established a procedural timeline for the exchange of appeal memos, objections, and replies via email and the e-portal.

12
Stage 11Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126016722021-09-03-2022

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 19.01.2021 and remanded the case back for fresh disposal, ruling that the executing authority cannot go behind the original decree regarding the validity of possession offers.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 19.01.2021 and remanded the case back for fresh disposal, ruling that the executing authority cannot go behind the original decree regarding the validity of possession offers. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR+1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR+1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 19.01.2021 and remanded the case back for fresh disposal, ruling that the executing authority cannot go behind the original decree regarding the validity of possession offers.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR+1%

Interest Period

delayed period till the date of possession

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17Section 40Section 63Section 64

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Abhishek Khare
  • Aahuti Agarwal

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Ankit Kumar
  • Surendra Kumar Mishra

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126016722021-09-03-2022

The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Regulatory Authority's order dated 19.01.2021 and remanded the case back for fresh disposal, ruling that the executing authority cannot go behind the original decree regarding the validity of possession offers.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for sahara prime city limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →