up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126025022024

Appellant / Complainant

Vikas Jain

VS

Respondent

Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited

Developer Firm

aims max gardenia developers private limited

Disputed Amount

40,12,462

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Legal Issues & Claims Raised

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

19 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126025022024 by Vikas Jain against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.

Delay in PossessionDelay Compensation / InterestSale Deed & Title Transfer
2
Stage 121/05/2025

for delivery of Judgment/Order

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to grant the appellant delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the promised possession date (01.03.2013) until actual possession (01.11.2018), ruling that statutory obligations under the RERA Act 2016 supersede conflicting Builder-Buyer Agreement terms.

3
Stage 214/05/2025

Further Hearing

The Tribunal ruled that the delay compensation already paid to the appellant must be deducted from the total interest component due under Section 18 of the Act, rather than being treated as a separate contractual payment.

4
Stage 329/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal heard arguments from both parties and adjourned the matter for further hearing on 14.05.2025.

5
Stage 410/04/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to reschedule the hearing of Appeal-189/2024 to 29.04.2025.

6
Stage 517/03/2025

Hearing

The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 10.04.2025 upon the joint request of the parties and directed that pleadings be completed in the interim.

7
Stage 617/02/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted that the pendency of the appeal will not affect ongoing execution proceedings and, upon the joint request of the parties, adjourned the matter to 17.03.2025.

8
Stage 706/01/2025

Admission

The Tribunal noted the filing of a Rejoinder Affidavit by the appellant and scheduled the appeal for a final hearing on 17.02.2025.

9
Stage 805/12/2024

Admission

The Tribunal noted that the respondent has paid the previously imposed cost of Rs 10,000 to the appellant and granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections.

10
Stage 906/11/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the appellant due to the failure to file objections despite a previous stop order.

11
Stage 1026/09/2024

Admission

The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day opportunity to file their Vakalatnama and objections, directing the exchange of soft copies and scheduling the next hearing for November 6, 2024.

12
Stage 1128/08/2024

Admission

The Tribunal confirmed sufficient service of notice on the respondent via post and granted the respondent 10 days to file objections, with a subsequent timeline for the appellant to file a rejoinder.

13
Stage 1225/07/2024

Admission

The Tribunal directed the appellant's counsel to upload the postal department's track record regarding the service of notice on the respondent's third address and scheduled the matter for hearing on 28.08.2024.

14
Stage 1331/05/2024

Admission

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and outlined the procedural timeline for service of appeal documents and the filing of objections and replies.

15
Stage 14Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025022024-05-12-2024

The Tribunal noted that the respondent has paid the previously imposed cost of Rs 10,000 to the appellant and granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections.

16
Stage 15Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025022024-21-05-2025

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to grant the appellant delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the promised possession date (01.03.2013) until actual possession (01.11.2018), ruling that statutory obligations under the RERA Act 2016 supersede conflicting Builder-Buyer Agreement terms.

17
Stage 16Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025022024-14-05-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the delay compensation already paid to the appellant must be deducted from the total interest component due under Section 18 of the Act, rather than being treated as a separate contractual payment.

18
Stage 17Interim Order

Tribunal Order #0901126025022024-06-11-2024

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the appellant due to the failure to file objections despite a previous stop order.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to grant the appellant delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the promised possession date (01.03.2013) until actual possession (01.11.2018), ruling that statutory obligations under the RERA Act 2016 supersede conflicting Builder-Buyer Agreement terms. Awarded in favor of Appellant. Awarded interest rate: MCLR + 1%.

Disposal Winner: AppellantInterest Rate: MCLR + 1%Status: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to grant the appellant delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the promised possession date (01.03.2013) until actual possession (01.11.2018), ruling that statutory obligations under the RERA Act 2016 supersede conflicting Builder-Buyer Agreement terms.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Awarded Interest Rate

MCLR + 1%

Interest Period

from 01.03.2013 to 01.11.2018

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)

Section 18(1)Section 11(4)(f)Section 17

Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates

Appellant Advocate(s)

  • Surangama Sharma

Respondent Advocate(s)

  • Suchita Singh

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (4)

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025022024-05-12-2024

The Tribunal noted that the respondent has paid the previously imposed cost of Rs 10,000 to the appellant and granted the appellant 10 days to file a rejoinder to the respondent's objections.

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025022024-21-05-2025

The Tribunal modified the impugned order to grant the appellant delay interest at the prescribed rate of MCLR+1% from the promised possession date (01.03.2013) until actual possession (01.11.2018), ruling that statutory obligations under the RERA Act 2016 supersede conflicting Builder-Buyer Agreement terms.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025022024-14-05-2025

The Tribunal ruled that the delay compensation already paid to the appellant must be deducted from the total interest component due under Section 18 of the Act, rather than being treated as a separate contractual payment.

INTERIM_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126025022024-06-11-2024

The Tribunal granted an adjournment to the respondent but imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the appellant due to the failure to file objections despite a previous stop order.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →