up_reraStatus: Completed
CASE ID: 0901126046222024

Appellant / Complainant

Arun Kumar

VS

Respondent

Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited

Developer Firm

aims max gardenia developers private limited

Disposal Award

Appellant

TathyaGrid Legal Copilot: Automated procedural intelligence extracted from official RERA tribunal records.
Analyze in Workspace

Case Procedural History & Progression Tree

Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.

5 Milestones
Filing Phase

Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration

Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126046222024 by Arun Kumar against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.

2
Stage 116/01/2025

For Order

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for condonation of a 215-day delay and dismissed the review petition, ruling that the promoter failed to provide sufficient cause and cannot shift the blame for negligence entirely onto their counsel.

3
Stage 217/12/2024

For Order

The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding a review application filed by the appellant and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies before the next hearing on 16.01.2025.

4
Stage 3Final Ruling Order

Tribunal Order #0901126046222024-16-01-2025

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for condonation of a 215-day delay and dismissed the review petition, ruling that the promoter failed to provide sufficient cause and cannot shift the blame for negligence entirely onto their counsel.

Disposal Phase

Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for condonation of a 215-day delay and dismissed the review petition, ruling that the promoter failed to provide sufficient cause and cannot shift the blame for negligence entirely onto their counsel. Awarded in favor of Appellant.

Disposal Winner: AppellantStatus: Completed

Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary

Official Ruling Summary

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for condonation of a 215-day delay and dismissed the review petition, ruling that the promoter failed to provide sufficient cause and cannot shift the blame for negligence entirely onto their counsel.

Ruling Awarded To

Appellant

Verified Tribunal DocumentationDownload Official Final Tribunal Order PDF

Official RERA Tribunal Orders (1)

FINAL_ORDEROrder ID: 0901126046222024-16-01-2025

The Tribunal rejected the respondent's application for condonation of a 215-day delay and dismissed the review petition, ruling that the promoter failed to provide sufficient cause and cannot shift the blame for negligence entirely onto their counsel.

TathyaGrid RERA Intelligence AI

Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?

Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.

Open AI Workspace →