Appellant / Complainant
Navin Kumar
Respondent
Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited
aims max gardenia developers private limited
₹8,18,238
Respondent
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048872021 by Navin Kumar against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a private settlement entered into before the project's RERA registration cannot be reopened or enforced under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 20.11.2024 for orders at the request of the appellant's counsel.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent and scheduled the next hearing for 16.10.2024, stipulating that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 23.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal engagement and rescheduled the hearing for 28.08.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal refers the parties to a previous order passed in Appeal No. 962/2021 for directions regarding this matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel time to examine an objection regarding the nature of the relief sought and adjourned the matter to 22.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to his father's illness and rescheduled the hearing for 23.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request by the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 19.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment from the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 16.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulties and rescheduled the hearing for 12.10.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 17.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 17.04.2023 because the respondent's counsel requested more time to prepare after being unaware of a previous order recalling the dismissal of the appeal.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and deadlines. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on 28.11.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the matter for hearing on 19.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and directed the respondent to file objections within one week, followed by a reply from the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal has listed Appeal-964/2021 for a hearing on 23.08.2022, referencing a previous order dated 02.08.2022.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections regarding the condonation of delay and grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the appellant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted service of notice upon the respondent and directed them to file objections to the limitation application within 10 days, scheduling the next hearing for April 25, 2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to serve notice to the respondent via dasti summons and directed the parties to file objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay before the next hearing on 28.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent regarding the appeal and scheduled the matter for 21.01.2022 to address the limitation application and any objections.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant two days to rectify procedural defects identified by the Registry and rescheduled the matter for hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126048872021-20-11-2024
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a private settlement entered into before the project's RERA registration cannot be reopened or enforced under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Tribunal Order #0901126048872021-19-10-2022
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and deadlines. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on 28.11.2022.
Tribunal Order #0901126048872021-08-07-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a private settlement entered into before the project's RERA registration cannot be reopened or enforced under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a private settlement entered into before the project's RERA registration cannot be reopened or enforced under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nitesh Anan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Suchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that a private settlement entered into before the project's RERA registration cannot be reopened or enforced under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and deadlines. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on 28.11.2022.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.