Appellant / Complainant
Reena Mishra
Respondent
Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited
aims max gardenia developers private limited
₹1,95,319
Respondent
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126048882021 by Reena Mishra against Aims Max Gardenia Developers Private Limited before up_rera.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the appellant confirmed receipt of the due amount of Rs. 1,95,319/- from the respondent.
For Order
The Tribunal granted a request to list the case for orders on 21.04.2026.
Further Hearing
The Respondent's counsel requested and was granted a seven-day extension to comply with the previous order dated 04.02.2026, with the case scheduled for orders on 27.02.2026.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim for delay interest under Section 18(1) of the Act and directed the respondent to upload the interest computation within one week and transfer the amount to the appellant.
Further Hearing
The court granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 04.02.2026.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal permitted the appellant to correct a transcription error regarding the delay interest date in the prayer clause and scheduled the next hearing for 15.01.2026.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and scheduled the next hearing for 12.01.2026, with a strict directive that no further adjournments will be granted.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the respondent's counsel and scheduled the case for orders on December 2, 2025.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the matter to 05.09.2025 for orders, following a request from the respondent's counsel.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 22.08.2025, with a warning that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment on behalf of the appellant's counsel and scheduled the appeal for orders on 08.08.2025.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal has adjourned the appeal for further hearing on 31.07.2025 to allow for necessary clarifications in the matter.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders or hearing on 11.07.2025, with a clarification that no further adjournments will be permitted on that date.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment application filed by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for May 19, 2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Further Hearing
The appeal was adjourned to 28.04.2025 because lawyers were abstaining from judicial work following a Real Estate Bar Association resolution.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 28.03.2025, noting that no further adjournments will be permitted.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request to list the appeal for orders or hearing on March 3, 2025.
Further Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 13.01.2025.
Hearing
The U.P. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has adjourned the appeal to 18.12.2024 for further hearing.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to list the appeal for orders on 20.11.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the matter to 16.10.2024 and explicitly stated that no further adjournments will be granted on the next scheduled date.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant and rescheduled the appeal for hearing/orders on 23.09.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request for adjournment made by the respondent's counsel due to personal engagement and rescheduled the hearing for 28.08.2024.
Hearing
This is a procedural order directing the parties to refer to a previously passed order dated in Appeal No. 962/2021 for the relevant orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the appellant's counsel additional time to address objections regarding the nature of the relief sought and rescheduled the hearing for 22.05.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to personal illness and rescheduled the hearing for 23.04.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted a request from the appellant's counsel to adjourn the matter and rescheduled the hearing for 19.03.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel and rescheduled the hearing for 16.02.2024.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the respondent's counsel due to personal difficulty and rescheduled the appeal for hearing on 12.10.2023.
Hearing
The tribunal granted an adjournment requested by the appellant's counsel due to illness and rescheduled the hearing for 17.05.2023.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings to 17.04.2023 following the respondent's request for more time to prepare their brief and address the closure of their opportunity to file objections.
Hearing
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant.
Hearing
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and the mandate of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Hearing
The Tribunal granted the respondent a final 10-day extension to file objections to the grounds of appeal and scheduled the next hearing for 19.10.2022.
Hearing
The Tribunal issued a procedural order to list Appeal No. 967/2021 on 20.09.2022, referencing a previous order passed in a related matter.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed that the appeal be listed for a hearing on 23.08.2022, referencing a previous order passed in a related matter.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent deadline for the applicant to file a reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal granted the respondent two weeks to file objections to the application for condonation of delay and the grounds of appeal, with a subsequent timeline set for the applicant's reply.
Delay condonation
The Tribunal noted service of notice upon the respondent and directed the respondent to file objections to the limitation application within 10 days, scheduling the matter for disposal on 25.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the appellant permission to serve the respondent via dasti summons and directed the parties to exchange objections and replies regarding the application for condonation of delay before the next hearing on 28.03.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal issued notice to the respondent and scheduled the matter for 21.01.2022 to address the disposal of the limitation application and any related objections.
Defect Removal
This is a procedural entry noting that the case was called on and that Mr. OmKumar, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882021-04-02-2026
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim for delay interest under Section 18(1) of the Act and directed the respondent to upload the interest computation within one week and transfer the amount to the appellant.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882021-08-07-2022
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
Tribunal Order #0901126048882021-19-10-2022
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and the mandate of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
Dismissed as withdrawn Awarded in favor of Respondent.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
Dismissed as withdrawn
Ruling Awarded To
Respondent
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Nitesh Anan
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Suchita Singh
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (3)
The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's claim for delay interest under Section 18(1) of the Act and directed the respondent to upload the interest computation within one week and transfer the amount to the appellant.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, noting that the delay was covered by the Supreme Court's Suo Moto orders regarding limitation extensions, and directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal.
The Tribunal closed the respondent's opportunity to file objections to the grounds of appeal due to their failure to comply with previous orders and the mandate of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
Need to research all rulings for aims max gardenia developers private limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.