Appellant / Complainant
Nisha Srivastava
Respondent
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited
ansal properties & infrastructure limited
Appellant
Legal Issues & Claims Raised
Case Procedural History & Progression Tree
Visual step-by-step tree detailing dispute origin, interim hearings, and final tribunal ruling.
Complaint Filing & Dispute Registration
Complaint registered under Case ID 0901126041472021 by Nisha Srivastava against Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited before up_rera.
For Order
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal regarding a developer's failure to pay installments, granting the appellant liberty to approach the Regulatory Authority for execution and full refund under the existing default clause.
For Order
The Tribunal directed the respondent's counsel to seek instructions regarding an alleged NCLT order and scheduled the matter for further orders on 15.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal granted an adjournment of the proceedings due to the illness of the Appellant's counsel and the unavailability of the Respondent's counsel, rescheduling the matter for hearing on 04.05.2023.
For Order
The Tribunal adjourned the proceedings and scheduled the next hearing for 23.03.2023 because a moratorium has been issued by the NCLT and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed.
For Order
The Tribunal granted U.P. RERA ten days to respond to a previous query and directed that the response be emailed to the appellant and uploaded to the e-portal before the next hearing on 12.12.2022.
For Order
The Tribunal examined the implications of a RERA refund order following the de-registration of the project and granted the respondent two days to seek instructions regarding their liability to pay despite the project's status.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted a delay by the Registry in sending a query letter to the RERA Secretary and has rescheduled the appeal for orders to 09.11.2022 while directing a reminder be sent.
Hearing
The Tribunal noted a procedural lapse regarding the transmission of previous orders to RERA and directed the Registrar and appellant's counsel to ensure the Secretary of RERA receives copies of the relevant orders.
Hearing
The Tribunal has called upon RERA to provide assistance on how a previous refund order can be executed given the project's de-registration and the respondent's seized accounts.
Hearing
The Tribunal adjourned the appeal to 28.07.2022 because the respondent's counsel was on sanctioned leave.
Hearing
The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a replication/rejoinder against the respondent's reply and scheduled the next hearing for 18.05.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted the respondent a one-week extension to file their vakalatnama and objections due to their office being previously sealed, with subsequent directions for electronic filing and a hearing date set for 12.04.2022.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the respondent to file objections and vakalatnama, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be used for the Legal Representative's library.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing.
Defect Removal
The Tribunal directed the appellant to remove all registry defects before the next hearing and ordered that notice be issued to the respondent via registered post and email.
Tribunal Order #0901126041472021-06-01-2022
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing.
Tribunal Order #0901126041472021-09-11-2022
The Tribunal examined the implications of a RERA refund order following the de-registration of the project and granted the respondent two days to seek instructions regarding their liability to pay despite the project's status.
Tribunal Order #0901126041472021-24-08-2022
The Tribunal has called upon RERA to provide assistance on how a previous refund order can be executed given the project's de-registration and the respondent's seized accounts.
Tribunal Order #0901126041472021-15-05-2023
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal regarding a developer's failure to pay installments, granting the appellant liberty to approach the Regulatory Authority for execution and full refund under the existing default clause.
Tribunal Order #0901126041472021-09-03-2022
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the respondent to file objections and vakalatnama, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be used for the Legal Representative's library.
Tribunal Disposal & Final Award Ruling
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal regarding a developer's failure to pay installments, granting the appellant liberty to approach the Regulatory Authority for execution and full refund under the existing default clause. Awarded in favor of Appellant.
Final Tribunal Order & Ruling Verdict Summary
Official Ruling Summary
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal regarding a developer's failure to pay installments, granting the appellant liberty to approach the Regulatory Authority for execution and full refund under the existing default clause.
Ruling Awarded To
Appellant
Statutory Sections Cited (RERA Act 2016)
Appearing Legal Counsel & Advocates
Appellant Advocate(s)
- Sushil Kumar Mishra
Respondent Advocate(s)
- Saurabh Misra
- Krishna Kumar Singh
- Gautam Johri
Official RERA Tribunal Orders (5)
The Tribunal directed the Registry to convert the defective appeal into a regular appeal and ordered the respondent to file a Vakalatnama and a reply to the grounds of appeal before the next hearing.
The Tribunal examined the implications of a RERA refund order following the de-registration of the project and granted the respondent two days to seek instructions regarding their liability to pay despite the project's status.
The Tribunal has called upon RERA to provide assistance on how a previous refund order can be executed given the project's de-registration and the respondent's seized accounts.
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal regarding a developer's failure to pay installments, granting the appellant liberty to approach the Regulatory Authority for execution and full refund under the existing default clause.
The Tribunal granted a final one-week extension for the respondent to file objections and vakalatnama, subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be used for the Legal Representative's library.
Need to research all rulings for ansal properties & infrastructure limited?
Extract builder dossiers, check execution status, and draft RERA appeal petitions in minutes using TathyaGrid.